Prioritization and Resource Allocation in Academic Global Health Partnerships.

OBJECTIVE: US-based academic institutions involved in global health (GH) partnerships can have a positive impact on health care systems in low/middle-income countries but lack a consistent approach. Existing priority setting and resource allocation (PSRA) frameworks do not adequately capture the interpersonal and sociopolitical complexity of decision-making in GH work. The authors explored how US-based GH practitioners prioritize and allocate resources for different types of support in academic GH partnerships. METHOD: In 2020 to 2021, the authors invited 36 US-based GH practitioners from the 2015 Pediatric GH Leadership Conference to participate in individual 1-hour semi-structured interviews. Using an iterative and inductive grounded theory approach, the study team analyzed interview transcripts through the lens of Heyse's framework on decision-making in humanitarian aid. RESULTS: The authors interviewed 20 GH practitioners and reached thematic sufficiency. A descriptive conceptual framework, capturing 18 distinct themes in 4 major categories, emerged from the data. In this framework, categories included: 1) stakeholders: those who influence and are influenced by the partnership; 2) goals: vision, mission, aims, and scope of the partnership; 3) implementation strategy: approach to accomplishing goals, categorized as relationship-oriented, task-oriented, context-oriented, or nonprescriptive; and 4) approach to conflict: response when goals and strategies do not align among stakeholders. CONCLUSION: Themes revealed a dynamic process for PSRA. Using our study findings, and building on existing literature, our framework highlights the complex interpersonal relationships, resource limitations, and sociopolitical and economic constraints that affect PSRA in GH partnerships. Finally, themes point to the field's evolution toward a more decolonized approach to GH.

Cultural considerations in health care capacity building: A qualitative study in Lesotho.

International non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and academic institutions support health care capacity building to strengthen health systems in low and middle-income countries. We conducted a phenomenological study of foreign and Basotho clinicians who participated in clinical continuing professional development (CPD) in Lesotho. Clinicians included physicians, nurses, and a nutritionist. We sought to understand, through the lens of social cognitive theory, how cultural differences between foreign and Basotho clinicians affected bidirectional clinical education led by NGOs and academic institutions. We also assessed how Basotho clinical educators considered culture when leading NGO-sponsored clinical CPD for Basotho clinicians. After analysing 17 interviews with 24 total participants (four foreign educators, 11 Basotho educators, and nine Basotho learners), using an iterative and inductive approach, we identified 17 themes within the cognitive, environmental, and behavioural domains. Key findings highlighted: (1) cultural tensions between foreign and Basotho culture, including bias against traditional culture; (2) power structures which affected the efficacy of in-service training strategies; (3) perceptions among foreign educators that technical assistance was more effective than direct service delivery at promoting education and sustainability. Educators should map out key relationships and engage local and foreign stakeholders in culturally-focused targeted needs assessments to improve curricular design in capacity building.

Pediatric Hospital Medicine and Global Health: A Fitting Niche for an Emerging Subspecialty.

As North American hospitals serve increasingly diverse patient populations, including recent immigrants, refugees, and returned travelers, all pediatric hospitalists (PHs) require foundational competency in global health, and a subset of PHs are carving out niches focused in global health. Pediatric hospitalists are uniquely positioned to collaborate with low- and middle-income country clinicians and child health advocates to improve the health of hospitalized children worldwide. Using the 2018 WHO standards for improving the quality of care for children and adolescents worldwide, we describe how PHs' skills align closely with what the WHO and others have identified as essential elements to bring high-quality, sustainable care to children in low- and middle-income countries. Furthermore, North American global health hospitalists bring home expertise that reciprocally benefits their home institutions.